Preserve every applicant network, cycle after cycle.
Every applicant from every cycle stays on the record, ready for the next round.
Used by artists working with
Institutions running programs on Artsume
Each cycle, you start from scratch
The applicant pool disappears the moment the cycle closes. Last year's strong submissions, jury notes and runner-ups are gone before the next call opens.
The old way
Applicant pools that die at decision day
When a cycle closes, the applicant pool disappears. Strong submissions from last year are buried in exports, unavailable when the next call opens.
Reviewer notes that leave with the jury
Jury members rotate every cycle. Their scoring rationale, shortlist reasoning and notes leave with them. No institutional memory remains.
No way to invite back strong runner-ups
The runner-up list is real program value, but there's no mechanism to reach those artists again when the next cycle opens.
The Artsume way
One applicant network across cycles
Every applicant who submits joins your program's network. Close a cycle; the network stays. Open the next call; the pool is already there.
Notes and scores attached to the artist
Jury scores, reviewer notes and shortlist flags persist on the artist record rather than a juror's inbox. New panel members inherit the full context.
Outreach to past applicants when the next call opens
Reach out to strong runner-ups, waitlisted artists, or anyone in Your artists when the next call opens. One message, warm audience.
A program that carries over between cycles
Intake, adjudication and alumni programming run in the same place, so each cohort adds to the last.
Reusable applicant network
Every cycle adds to a permanent applicant network. Artists stay connected to your program long after the cycle closes.
Cross-cycle continuity
Artist profiles persist across cohorts. See who applied last year, what the jury said, and how careers have progressed.
Rotating panels, persistent notes
Jury members rotate; their scoring history doesn't. New reviewers inherit the full record and evaluate with proper context.
Blind review
Hide identifying information from your panel during adjudication so they evaluate work on merit. You choose what's hidden; program leads and admins keep full visibility.
Custom scoring rubrics
Define evaluation criteria that match your program's values. Reviewers score consistently using the same structured rubric each cycle.
Team collaboration
Invite panel members, program staff, and directors to review together. Score, comment, and decide in one place.
Launch your next residency cycle in minutes
Build the call once, then reuse it every cycle.
Launch the call
Deadlines, stipend details, housing, session dates. Set up once, reuse every cycle.
Receive applications
Submissions flow into your applicant network, portfolio-first and organized by cycle.
Run your panel
Blind review, custom rubrics, and shared notes. Full context for every juror.
Notify. Keep the pool.
Send decision letters. Every applicant stays in Your artists for the next call.
How we protect applicant data
Applicant data is sensitive. We treat it that way.
Enterprise-grade security
256-bit encryption, SOC 2 compliant infrastructure
Data privacy
GDPR compliant. Your data is never sold or shared
99.9% uptime
Reliable infrastructure with automated backups
Audit trail
Complete history of all actions for compliance
Your data stays yours
Export any list you build to CSV, on Artsume Intelligence
Dedicated support
Real humans ready to help when you need it
Build the network for free. Pay for deeper intelligence.
Start with Artsume Network to run programs and keep your artist relationships. Move up to Artsume Intelligence for screening, reviewer pools, scoring rubrics and reporting.
Questions from institutions.
What happens to applicants we didn't accept?
They stay in your applicant network, already reviewed, scored and tagged. When the next call opens the runner-up pool is right there, and you can reach out to strong candidates without starting from a blank list. That pool is real program value, and most residency platforms throw it away on decision day.
How is this different from a CRM?
A CRM is only as current as the last person who updated it, and artists never log in to do that. On Artsume they own their profiles and keep them up to date. The profile is the credential for an arts career, with portfolio, CV and history attached. Your residency gets the relationship layer, and every artist gets an identity they carry to other programs.
How does blind review work for residency selection?
Blind review hides identifying information from your panel while they adjudicate, so they evaluate the work on merit. You choose what's hidden: artist name, location, contact details, links, institution, references. Program leads, owners and admins keep full visibility, so they can still administer the call. Reviewer scores are governed separately. Set review visibility to blind until decisions are released. No one sees another reviewer's scores while the panel is in flight.
Can multiple staff and jury members review together?
Yes. Invite panel members, program directors, and staff to review together. Each reviewer scores independently using your custom rubric, and you see aggregate scores alongside individual notes.
How much does Artsume cost for residency programs?
Getting started is free with Artsume Network: unlimited residency calls, applications, and team members, plus your artist network and simple reviews. Artsume Intelligence ($79/month billed annually, or $129/month monthly) adds advanced blind review, custom scoring rubrics, reporting, and written artist overviews. We only charge a 10% platform fee when you collect application payments through Stripe, and that 10% is all-in: Artsume covers the card processing, with no monthly minimum and no per-payout charge.
Still have a question?
Built for every kind of arts organization
Build the artist network behind your organization.
Run your programs, review applications, and keep every relationship in one place.





























